Analysis of Leadership Using The Road to Guilford Courthouse
This is a topic suggestion on Analysis of Leadership from omesp. Use this topic or order a custom research paper, written exactly how you need it to be.
Write a leadership analysis of one of the leaders as depicted in The Road to Guilford Courthouse by John Buchanan. The leadership analysis must be 750 to 1000 words, 12pt. Courier New Font, on plain letterhead, and double spaced.
Your reference is Field Manual (FM) 6-22, Army Leadership and The Road to Guilford Courthouse by John Buchanan.
How to Write a Analysis of The Road to Guilford Courthouse
- Present a brief overview of the book.
- Analyze the leadership ability of a character in the book.
- This is not a book report, but an analysis of the leadership qualities of a character in the book (in other words the bulk of your report should focus on leadership).
- Use the nine leadership competencies and/or the Be, Know, Do principles from FM 22-100.
- Finally, summarize and make a recommendation for the book – positive or negative.
Criteria For Leadership Research Paper
1. Evaluation: In your analysis of leadership research paper, keep in mind the following: substance, organization, style, and correctness. The evaluator will consider the following questions as he evaluates your book review.
- Substance. Have you focused on a specific aspect, perspective, position, or problem; audience / decision maker; and recommendation? Have you considered alternatives sufficiently? Is there enough information? Do you sufficiently analyze your facts to give the reader enough evidence for the decision?
- Organization. Is your controlling idea up front so the listener knows immediately what you want to do? Do you clearly state your main supporting points? Have you packaged your briefing to help the busy listener? Do you smoothly transition between ideas?
- Style. Have you chosen familiar and unpretentious vocabulary words? Have you avoided long and cumbersome sentences?
- Correctness. Is your presentation free of distracting errors? Have you observed the conventions of Standard English? Have you used proper format? Does the paper meet length requirements?